Sample bios for online dating
Twitter biographies might be the ultimate creative-writing challenge. The
[email protected] Woodcock I am a sample size of one, not statistically significant, nor [email protected] Blogging Mom Smart ass blogging mom.
Anything that happens before that is just
[email protected] Bald. Easily [email protected] The only person on Twitter who doesn’t claim to be a social media guru.
Previous funny Twitter bio editions:20 of the world’s wittiest Twitter bios20 of the all-time most clever Twitter bios20 of the all-time funniest Twitter bios (part 2!
I checked out the Department of Earth Sciences at Brock University and noticed that they offer a radiocarbon dating service.
One of their samples BGS-43 was dated 3000 YEARS IN THE FUTURE, more than once.
Radioisotope dating relies on unprovable assumptions about the past, and unless we have reliable historical dates for objects, we cannot be certain that their calculated ages are accurate.
The only reliable way to date anything is by the historical method—relying on trustworthy records such as the Bible. Archaeologists will readily dismiss carbon-dating ages if they do not agree with the date they want or expect: For example Australian archaeologist Dr Josephine Flood rejected the 30,000 year carbon-dates for ‘Mungo Man’ because she believes, based on other dating methods such as electron spin resonance, that Mungo Man is 60,000 years old.wrong.There is evidence of changes in carbon isotope ratios from era to era, region to region, species to species, and even from one part of an individual organism to another part.For examples, see the section ‘Other factors affecting carbon dating’ from Chapter 4 ‘What about carbon dating?Dear Mr P Thank you for your email of 6 March, submitted via our website. April 2014] The BGS-43 entry records this sample as coming from a large bore hole in Oak Island, Canada.I found the entry for the BGS-43 wood sample you referred to in the table at Brock University. The entry includes the comment ‘The “Calculated Age” is ~ +3000 yrs into the future.Repeated sample and got the same results.’ Testing of atmospheric nuclear bombs in the 1950s and 60s dramatically increased levels of radiocarbon (carbon-14, C) in the atmosphere—see the graph below.